OpenNash ↗
AI evaluation domain · 15 source-backed records

RAG, Retrieval, and Embedding Benchmarks

RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) evaluation must measure retrieval and answers separately. This list includes embedding and retrieval suites, grounded answer tests, long-context tests, and document parsing benchmarks.

15 benchmarksVerified 2026-11-03JSON data ↓
Decision guidance

How should teams evaluate a RAG system?

Measure retrieval with labeled query-document pairs and metrics such as Recall@k (share of relevant documents in the top k results). Measure answers separately for faithfulness, relevance, citation support, and correct refusals.

15

Benchmarks in this domain

Sources first · alphabetical collection order

Runnability describes access to a usable repository, dataset, or harness—not whether setup is easy.

ArguAna

specializedrunnable
2026-11-03
Tests
Gives a retriever an argument and asks it to find the best counterargument in a corpus. It is one of the BEIR (Benchmarking-IR) retrieval datasets.
Best for
Diagnosing semantic retrieval beyond topical similarity.
Classification
benchmark · current · open

BEIR

recommendedrunnable
2026-10-26
Tests
BEIR (Benchmarking-IR) tests zero-shot retrieval across 18 public datasets from different tasks and domains. It checks how well retrievers work on data they did not train on.
Best for
Retriever selection for RAG systems
Classification
benchmark · current · open

BRIGHT

specializedrunnable
2026-11-03
Tests
Gives a retriever 1,384 real queries from fields such as economics, psychology, math and coding. Finding the relevant documents needs reasoning, not only keyword or topic match.
Best for
Selecting retrievers for difficult research and professional search tasks.
Classification
benchmark · emerging · open

CRAG

recommendedrunnable
2026-10-26
Tests
CRAG gives a RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) system 4,409 factual questions in five domains. Mock web search and knowledge-graph APIs supply the retrieval.
Best for
RAG factuality and retrieval stress tests
Classification
benchmark · current · open

DocVQA

recommendedpartial
2026-10-26
Tests
Gives a model document images and questions about them. Tests whether the model can read text, layout and structure to answer.
Best for
PDF, OCR, and document-agent evaluation
Classification
benchmark · current · mixed

ExtractBench

specializedrunnable
2026-11-03
Tests
Gives a system a full document and a user schema. It must return schema-valid JSON with a page and bounding box for each value.
Best for
Choosing extraction systems where each value must point to its evidence.
Classification
benchmark · emerging · open

InfiniteBench

recommendedrunnable
2026-10-26
Tests
Tests long-context models on 12 tasks with average inputs above 100,000 tokens, in English and Chinese. Tasks include book QA, summarization, code debugging and key retrieval.
Best for
Context-window stress testing
Classification
benchmark · current · open

LongBench / LongBench v2

recommendedrunnable
2026-10-26
Tests
LongBench tests long-context understanding on 21 datasets in English and Chinese. LongBench v2 uses 503 hard multiple-choice questions with contexts from 8,000 to 2 million words.
Best for
Long-context model screening
Classification
benchmark · current · open

MDPBench

specializedrunnable
2026-11-03
Tests
Tests document parsing on 3,400 digital and photographed document images in 17 languages. It covers many scripts and low-resource languages.
Best for
Comparing document intelligence pipelines serving multilingual corpora.
Classification
benchmark · emerging · open

MTEB

recommendedrunnable
2026-10-26
Tests
MTEB (Massive Text Embedding Benchmark) tests text embedding models on many tasks, such as retrieval, clustering, classification, reranking and semantic similarity. The first release had 58 datasets in 112 languages.
Best for
Embedding and retrieval model selection
Classification
benchmark · current · open

olmOCR-bench

specializedrunnable
2026-11-03
Tests
Tests OCR (optical character recognition) systems on 1,403 PDF files with 7,010 unit tests. Tests check text, tables, math, reading order and removal of headers and footers.
Best for
Choosing extraction components before evaluating downstream document RAG.
Classification
benchmark · emerging · open

OmniDocBench

recommendedrunnable
2026-10-26
Tests
Tests PDF document parsing on pages from many sources, such as papers, textbooks, newspapers and handwritten notes. It checks text, layout, tables, formulas and reading order.
Best for
Document parsing for RAG pipelines
Classification
benchmark · current · open

ParseBench

specializedrunnable
2026-11-03
Tests
Tests document parsers on about 2,000 human-verified pages from enterprise documents in insurance, finance and government. It checks tables, charts, content faithfulness, formatting and visual grounding.
Best for
Selecting a parser before measuring retrieval and grounded-answer quality.
Classification
benchmark · emerging · open

RAGBench

recommendedrunnable
2026-10-26
Tests
Gives 100,000 labeled RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) examples from industry corpora such as user manuals, in five domains. It uses the TRACe metrics to score retrieval and answers.
Best for
RAG system evaluation
Classification
benchmark · current · open

Real5-OmniDocBench

specializedrunnable
2026-11-03
Tests
Rebuilds the 1,355 OmniDocBench v1.5 pages under five physical conditions: scan, warp, screen photo, lighting, and skew.
Best for
Checking whether a parser still works on phone photos and poor scans.
Classification
benchmark · emerging · open